Tuesday, February 07, 2012
Saturday, February 04, 2012
Friday, February 03, 2012
Thursday, February 02, 2012
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Monday, January 30, 2012
Sunday, January 29, 2012
“L’embargo pétrolier, erreur stratégique de l’Union européenne”
“L’embargo pétrolier, erreur stratégique de l’Union européenne”: "Les Européens ont fait une grave erreur stratégique. Ils pouvaient jouer un rôle constructif en engageant un dialogue avec Téhéran : au contraire, ce geste a détruit les fondements des relations entre Europe et Iran établies au dernier siècle. Les sanctions, de tous types, vont créer des dommages pour l’économie iranienne et pour ses citoyens, mais ne pousseront pas l’Iran à renoncer à ses droits légitimes garantis par le Traité de Non Prolifération, qui incluent l’enrichissement de l’uranium. L’Iran a subi des sanctions depuis la révolution de 1979, et cela n’a pas empêché le pays de faire de grands progrès dans les domaines du nucléaire et des technologies chimiques, biologiques et balistiques.
"
'via Blog this'
"
'via Blog this'
Friday, January 27, 2012
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
inventions on a candel flame
The purpose
of this event is to try to explain and hope to further enhance the perception
and curiosity of the reader and direct him towards an observation of reality outside
of what actually most of us consider as real.
Reality is
assume as what the objective tangible world presents us with, what is tangible
what is matter, on the other hand we got something we call mind and in this
context we assume that reality is what is inside our minds and reality somewhat
exist inside ourselves as it exist outside ourselves, our bodies become a point of reference.
The conclusive
facts cannot determine what certainty actually is, if it is a combine action
between our minds and the outside world, if is just the outside world that reacts
with predetermined concepts, or even it could be just an ethereal manifestation
of an external force. We can put as many philosophical and scientific theories
about the subject and still we will find ourselves with questions that have no
answers of what is inside us and what does exist outside ourselves. In other
words humans don’t really know what reality is as an absolute, they can only
follow their own survival guidance and avoid to many difficult questions about
what they are, what actually is a mind and even less determine what
consciousness is. This is the principal purpose of this expose, as the aim is
to twist the mind and excited it towards an acceptance of new concepts in order
to further its own investigation about reality as well open further inquiries
about what reality is all about.
To achieve
this feat I shall use art as my method of communication as well as tool of
experiment.
To begin with,
I shall expose to you a painting, a particular painting that depicts
symbolically the events that our realm actually is currently experiencing. I
shall point out that the detailed events are events into which we happen to be
immersed; however, most of us fail to recognize and identify.
The reason
of this denial can be attributed to our programing, more precisely how our
minds have being form to function in correlation to our cultural programing and
the information put into it as it is this precedent information that determines
what we think of one subject, and how that subject is accepted or denied by our
own consciousness. However regardless of our convictions proper actions prevail
over improper actions, this fact determines that somehow, there is a guideline
of conduct, there are certain parameters that stay put regardless of what the
individual consciousness is prime to rely on. Examples of this reality can be, tested
by the latest attempts of men to follow their own individual beliefs, even if
they seem to be in contradiction to a set of facts. More precisely the
individuals believe that what he thinks is what will happen in our realm. Certainly
this facts have multiple outcomes, never the less when the believe address an
inconsistency it’s outcome is always negative. We can take for instance Hitler,
the war in Vietnam, the war in North Korea, the war in Iraq, the Israeli state
and many other examples in our current realm.
All this
events begun with a believer acting in accordance with reason, and delivering
the most comprehensive and logical argument of what he was doing was the right
thing to do. From Israel rhetoric to the war on Iraq, we have experience
dissolution, rather than a satisfaction. Even now, 2012 Israel is set into
creating another holocaust with Iran. This behavior designs clearly how
concepts not only determine what the individual believes but also even shape
his actions. We can argue that politicians act politically nevertheless;
consequences are facts not political speech making. A nuclear war will kill
many individuals, as Hitler’s war killed many individuals.
Therefore,
we have a reality that affects our bodies; however, minds are enclosing in
those bodies in consequence we might ask? Do minds exist after their recipient
ceases to be, or are do they have an eternal existence. In many ways mind exist
in both states as a dead entity and as living one, however this living realm
exist only on the minds of the existing at the moment, meaning the living
container of the mind, the body. In this context it exist simultaneously in the
body of those alive as well as in their minds, at the same time that mind could
have existed on a body that has die long ago. Reason might come to the rescue
and determine a logical conclusion, as if there was a conclusion. In fact,
there is no conclusion when we look at what a quantum physicist might say about
it. A particle that is at two places at once.
What does
makes sense here is not the programed concept of the individuals but the
different voices that emerge of the actually between the combatant. Opposite
points of view, emerge as the events unfold, some on the side of the Israelis
or the Nazis and others quite opposite to it.
Are this
events purely on the mind or are they representing a reality? We can determine
that inside each of these individuals, there is a mind as well as a body, we do
know that in wars people die, as well, and we do know that the minds of those
same people will eventually die as well.
After a
detailed investigation, we can conclude that in the past 900 years the number
of bodies that existed at that time had minds and of those minds all exist as imprinted
examples to our current realm all of them representing a positive and a
negative point.
An
existence and an absence of existence; they exist with us today on our memory
and that took place via the information provided to us voluntarily and involuntarily.
Therefore, we can conclude that many of the elements that determine our mental
behavior are stored on memory sets. We can also say that those memory sets
exist in our minds, however they as well exist on our bodies, and we can determine
that is the body the one that somehow keeps the mind alive, we can imagine a hill
and the top of the hill; the mind of the hill.
However
logic will say that a hill does not have a mind, the summit is geological
therefore does not exist as a living element, in short does not think. On the
other hand, there is Moses who received the 10 commandments on the top of a
hill. Logic however will not give credibility to the mind of the hill; rather
it gives belief to a further mind. To our current realm the mind of Moses,
exist now with us as it does not, we cannot touch it, but we can think it,
extracted from our memory sets. However, we can question the existence of the
body, but never the realm of the mind.
Perhaps we
can say understanding the concepts how our minds function, and what role does
memory plays between the concepts we credence and the concepts that are real.
The outside
in of our minds is our bodies, it is the body the sensor, and the mind the analyzer,
however understanding the balance of this complex relationship demands the
awareness of infinite details.
The insight
out of our minds is our body, and having our body in a good harmonious
relationship with our minds brings us to the enhancement of our existence and
the preservation of our body.
Symbols, in
our current state of mind relate us to products as well as to historical events,
the Nazi swastika as the finger of a rebellion, as the color of a flag. some
might argue that is the identity that determines the reasoning, however flags
are all made alike what changes is the colors and the forms, sometimes shapes
can be created to distinguish one from the other, but the fact is flags have no
identity, the identity is in reality on the mind. The mind determines and creates
the value of the flag.
However, the
body defends the flag in question the body dies for the eventual flag this
indicates the value of symbols, and how a symbol can become more important to the
individual than his own body; knowingly that without the body the mind ceases to
be.
So how is
it that minds can drive bodies to their own death?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)